How the field library is made

Editorial standards and research method

LithoMap is designed to make geology useful without making it sound more certain than the evidence allows. These standards apply to formation profiles, state geology, identification guides, comparisons, and interactive resources.

Download LithoMapPut U.S. geology in your pocket.Choose Google Play or the App Store.

Our working principles

Useful, traceable, and honestly qualified

Each page should help a reader answer a real question, show the evidence behind the answer, and explain what the page cannot establish.

Start with authoritative sources

We prefer government geological surveys, national scientific databases, university or museum collections, peer-reviewed research, and formal stratigraphic references. Secondary sources may help locate a primary record, but they do not replace it when a stronger source is available.

Write every explanation originally

Sources support facts, dates, definitions, and interpretations. LithoMap does not copy source prose or mechanically rearrange it. Guides are synthesized in new language for the specific question a field user is likely to ask.

Keep uncertainty visible

Geologic boundaries, ages, names, fossil ranges, mineral occurrences, and field identifications can be approximate, disputed, revised, or scale-dependent. We state important limits beside the claim instead of hiding them in a general disclaimer.

Separate evidence from permission

A scientific record or mapped unit does not prove that a specimen occurs at a particular point, that land is open, or that collecting is lawful. Visitors must confirm ownership, access, closures, permits, and current rules with the responsible authority.

Verify image rights before publication

Scientific pages use public-domain or openly licensed images only after the source record, creator, license, and required attribution are checked. When an image is resized, cropped, or converted for web delivery, the page discloses that modification when the license requires it.

Revise without erasing context

We correct material errors, update source-led facts, and improve explanations as evidence changes. Page dates and source lists help readers judge recency. We do not claim named expert review unless that review actually occurred and can be credited accurately.

Research workflow

From source record to published guide

  1. Define the question.Identify the reader’s task and the claims needed to answer it.
  2. Collect and compare sources.Resolve names, ages, locations, properties, and conflicts with the strongest available records.
  3. Draft an original explanation.Synthesize evidence in direct language, organized around observable facts and practical context.
  4. Check claims and limits.Verify citations, terminology, uncertainty, safety notes, legal context, and image permissions.
  5. Publish for people and machines.Add canonical metadata, structured data, a sitemap entry, and a page-specific plain-text reference.
  6. Review and revise.Correct errors and update material facts when better evidence becomes available.

Identification is a hypothesis

Rock and mineral names on this website are preliminary possibilities derived from visible properties and simple tests. Weathering, coatings, mixed grains, alteration, treatments, and manufactured materials can mislead. Valuable, hazardous, or ambiguous samples may require a qualified specialist, microscopy, chemistry, spectroscopy, or X-ray diffraction.

Maps are models, not surveyed truth

Map layers combine records created at different scales, dates, and levels of detail. A boundary can be generalized or uncertain, GPS can be wrong, and field conditions can change. LithoMap maps are informational and never establish a legal boundary, ownership, permission, safe access, or the presence of a collectible specimen.

Corrections and questions

If a page appears inaccurate, outdated, unclear, or improperly attributed, email contact@ptwreferrals.com with the page URL, the specific concern, and a supporting source when available. We evaluate the evidence before changing scientific content.